The original scan results can be seen on the left. And they were somehow interpreted to this?

📍First order of business: A 3rd party should conduct immediate secondary testing, and compare scan results

And, a neutral 3rd party should analyze and interpret both sets of scans

📍The most important aspect of this potential discovery is not necessarily the size/depth of the discovery, but rather the fact that a potential subterranean extension of the Pyramid could exist.

That would be exceptionally strong suggestive evidence that the Pyramids are a lost technology of some kind, as many, (including myself, have long believed).

However, it’s entirely possible that these scans have been massively misinterpreted and/or greatly exaggerated.

Make no mistake, I want them to be real.

📍But it is a fact that it is premature to conclude anything.

📍And that is exactly why EVERYONE should be calling on immediate further testing and excavation of the Giza Plateau.

Drill a hole straight down and let’s see what we find!

But based on the interpretation of this scan, it does seem to be wildly exaggerated.

But, we’ll never know what the truth actually is until we go looking and find out. So, let’s not take 3 years for another scan. Somebody needs to get on it pronto.

📍To be clear: If it were up to me, we would forego a secondary scan, and DRILL.
Because regardless of what any scan shows, everyone will be speculating and arguing what the data shows.

There is only one true way to find out: Drill down and send a tethered camera and see what we see.